Kissing Camels Surgery Center, LLC et al v. HCA Inc. et al

Filing 386

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Discovery/Status Conference held on 1/21/2016 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Counterclaim Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Strike Counterclaim Plaintiffs' First S et of Interrogatories and Second requests for Production of Document 380 is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept the Reply [380-1]. The Motion to Strike Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories and Second Requests for Producti on of Documents 366 is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as stated on the record. Status Report due by 2/11/2016. Status Conference set for 2/23/2016 10:00 AM for two hours in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. FTR: Courtroom C-204. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG Civil Action: Courtroom Deputy: 12-cv-03012-WJM-NYW Brandy Simmons Date: January 21, 2016 FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-204* Parties Attorney(s) KISSING CAMELS SURGERY CENTER, LLC, CHERRY CREEK SURGERY CENTER, LLC, ARAPAHOE SURGERY CENTER, LLC, HAMPDEN SURGERY CENTER, LLC, Deborah J. Winegard Plaintiffs, v. CENTURA HEALTH CORPORATION, AETNA, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE OF COLORADO, INC., ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado, COLORADO AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER ASSOCIATION, INC., Melvin B. Sabey Laura M. Sturges Richard B. Benenson Justin L. Cohen Elizabeth A. Jose (via telephone) Kathryn A. Reilly Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER DISCOVERY/STATUS CONFERENCE Court in Session: 2:00 p.m. Appearance of counsel. Discussion held regarding Joint Status Reports [376] and [382] filed December 22, 2015 and January 14, 2016. ORDERED: Counterclaim Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Strike Counterclaim Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories and Second requests for Production of Document [380] is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept the Reply [380-1]. Discussion held regarding the outstanding technical issues related to the electronic database outlined in the Status Report [376]. Defendants anticipate a 30(b)(6) deposition of the data custodians. Discussion held regarding Plaintiffs’ supplemental documents outlined in the Status Report [376] in pages 10-12. Discussion held regarding additional search terms. ORDERED: On or before February 4, 2016, parties shall meet and confer about additional search terms and additional custodians. ORDERED: Defendants shall serve a notice of the 30(b)(6) deposition of the data custodians on or before February 5, 2016. The 30(b)(6) designee(s) shall be available for the deposition during the month of February 2016. Discussion and argument on the Motion to Strike Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories and Second Requests for Production of Documents [366] filed December 10, 2015. ORDERED: The Motion to Strike Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories and Second Requests for Production of Documents [366] is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as stated on the record. Plaintiffs are directed to serve responses to discovery on or before February 4, 2016, consistent with the court’s direction. A separate written order to issue on Defendants’ Requests for Production. ORDERED: A joint status report is due on or before February 11, 2016. Parties are directed to identify all discovery issues to be discussed during the Status Conference. ORDERED: A Status Conference is set for two hours on February 23, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom C-204, before Magistrate Judge Wang. Court in Recess: 3:43 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 01:43 * To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Stevens-Koenig Reporting at (303) 988-8470.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?