Kaighn v. Astrue
Filing
10
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 4/15/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 5/15/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/30/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/26/13. (sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-03027-AP
Kenneth Kaighn,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security1
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Gail C. Harriss
450 S. Camino del Rio, Suite 201
Durango, CO 81301
970-247-4411
gharriss@harrisslaw.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 844-0815
stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
J.B. García
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
1
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to
Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted for Michael J.
Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the
last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
-1-
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: December 10, 2012
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: November 16, 2012
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: February 5, 2013
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and
accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or
defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Due to Defendant’s counsel’s caseload, the parties request a briefing schedule outside of the
standard time frame.
A.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: April 15, 2013
B.
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: May 15, 2013
C.
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 30, 2013
-2-
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.
( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
B.
(X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 26th day of February, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
s/Gail C. Harriss
/s/ Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Gail C. Harriss
450 S. Camino del Rio, Suite 201
Durango, CO 81301
970-247-4411
gharriss@harrisslaw.com
By: Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1001 17th Street, 6th Floor
Denver, CO 80202
303-844-0815
stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?