Harrison v. Astrue

Filing 10

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/25/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/24/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/9/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/13/13. (sgrim)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-03044-AP
PATRICIA D. HARRISON,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
______________________________________________________________________________
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Sokolow
1155 Kelly Johnson Blvd., Suite 111
Colorado Springs, CO 80920
Telephone [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]
THAYNE WARNER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

1

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
C.

4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: November 19, 2012
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: November 26, 2012
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 24, 2013

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and
accurate. However, the Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement the record if necessary at the time
of the Opening Brief.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or
defenses.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters anticipated.
With regard to prior judicial involvement, the parties note that this matter is not a matter on remand
from this or any other court.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
B.
C.

9.

Plaintiff’s Opening Brief Due: March 25, 2013
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: April 24, 2013
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 9, 2013

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.

Plaintiff’s Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant’s Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

2

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11.

OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S CLIENT, ALL
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.
DATED this 13TH day of February, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
___________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]

/s/ Anthony L. Sokolow
1155 Kelly Johnson Blvd., Suite 111
Colorado Springs, CO 80920
Telephone [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

By: /s/ M. Thayne Warner
M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

3

4