Escobar v. Trani et al

Filing 68

MINUTE ORDER striking 66 Plaintiff Motions the Court for Mercy by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/29/14.(dkals, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03052-CMA-KLM
JOSE MEDINA ESCOBAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN TRANI,
MAJOR HOLDITCH,
CAPTAIN HUERTAS,
LIEUTENANT TRAVIS,
LIEUTENANT TIDEMANN,
LIEUTENANT VANGELDER,
LIEUTENANT RUNDLE,
LIEUTENANT WILL,
SERGEANT LANGDON,
SERGEANT WAGNER,
SERGEANT COSSABONE,
SERGEANT CROSLEY,
SERGEANT WORTHEN,
SERGEANT REED,
SERGEANT BORDERS,
C/O GALLAHER,
C/O AURITI,
C/O MCPHERSON,
C/O VIGIL,
C/O CASADY,
C/O WHITFIELD,
C/O GROOM,
C/O ESLINGER,
C/O CAMERON,
C/O CORTEZ,
C/O BODYCOMB,
C/O SPURLOCK,
C/O THORSTAD,
C/O SOLIZ,
C/O DICKENS, and
C/O FLICK,
Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on a document entitled Plaintiff Motions the Court
for Mercy [#66]1 (the “Motion”). On December 20, 2013, the Court entered its Order for
Administrative Closure [#65] (the “Order”), which ordered that this case be administratively
closed. In the Order, the Court informed the parties that if they “wish to reopen this case,
they shall file an appropriate motion to reopen this matter for good cause within 60 days
from the date of this Order.” Order [#65] at 2. The Motion does not request reopening of
this case. See generally Motion [#66]. In addition, the Motion was filed in all three of
Plaintiff’s pending cases, including one that remains open in which he has counsel. See
12-cv-01662-CMA-CBS Docket at [#90]. Accordingly, the Court will not treat the Motion
as a motion to reopen this case. As a result, no motion to reopen the case has been filed
and the case remains administratively closed. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#66] is STRICKEN.
Dated: January 29, 2014

1

“[#66]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.

2