Henn et al v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
MINUTE ORDER denying 102 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/16/2014.(trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03077-RM-KLM
(Consolidated with Civil Action No. 13-cv-01217-RM-KLM)
PRESTON B. HENN, individually, and
BETTY D. HENN, individually,
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation,
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC.,
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant’s Motion to Allow Two
Employee Depositions in the Depositions Allowed Pursuant to the Court’s Minute
Order of April 3, 3024, Extending Discovery Cut-Off [#102]1 (the “Motion”). Third-Party
Defendant has failed to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a), which provides as follows:
Before filing a motion, counsel for the moving party or an unrepresented
party shall confer or make reasonable good faith efforts to confer with any
opposing counsel or unrepresented party to resolve any disputed matter.
The moving party shall describe in the motion, or in a certificate attached to
the motion, the specific efforts to fulfill this duty.
In the Motion, Third-Party Defendant fails to state whether the Motion is opposed and
“[#102]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.
whether counsel conferred regarding the requested relief. The Motion may be denied on
this basis alone. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#102] is DENIED without prejudice.
Dated: April 16, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?