reFX AUDIO SOFTWARE INC. v. Does 1-123
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 121 Plaintiffs Combined Motion to Compel Discovery Against Keith Estes, to Modify the Discovery Schedule and for Attorneys Fees, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/27/2014.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03146-WYD-MEH
reFX AUDIO SOFTWARE INC.,
DARRYL JOHNSON II,
KEITH ESTES, and
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 27, 2014.
Plaintiff’s Combined Motion to Compel Discovery Against Keith Estes, to Modify the
Discovery Schedule and for Attorney’s Fees [filed January 25, 2014; docket #121] is denied
without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 37.1, which states:
A motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 or 37 directed to an interrogatory, request or
response under Fed. R. Civ. P. 33, 34 or 36 shall set forth, either in the text of the
motion or in an exhibit to the motion, the specific interrogatory, request or response
to which the motion is directed.
Id. (emphasis added). The Court cannot determine from the motion or its attachments whether
Plaintiff challenges each and every discovery response provided by Defendant Estes or only certain
of the Defendant’s responses.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?