Hall v. Brown et al

Filing 50

MINUTE ORDER granting 48 Motion to Amend, and denying as moot 38 Motion to Dismiss, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/16/13.(dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-03204-CMA-KLM JESUS HALL, Plaintiff, v. J. BROWN, RN, DR. ALLRED, MCDERMOT, Health Admin, and HAVER, Off, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [#38] and on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint [#48] (the “Motion to Amend”). The Court has reviewed the proposed Third Amended Complaint [#48-1] submitted by Plaintiff and finds that the pleading should be accepted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), which states in part that “[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Amend [#48] is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall accept Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint [#48-1] for filing as of the date of this Minute Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [#38] is DENIED as moot. See, e.g., Strich v. United States, No. 09-cv-01913-REB-KLM, 2010 WL 14826, at *1 (D. Colo. Jan. 11, 2010) (citations omitted) (“The filing of an amended complaint moots a motion to dismiss directed at the complaint that is supplanted and superseded.”); AJB Props., Ltd. v. Zarda Bar-B-Q of Lenexa, LLC, No. 09-2021-JWL, 2009 WL 1140185, at *1 (D. Kan. Apr. 28, 2009) (finding that amended complaint superseded original complaint and “accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss the original complaint is denied as moot”); Gotfredson v. Larsen LP, 432 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1172 (D. Colo. 2006) (noting that defendants’ motions to dismiss are “technically moot because they are directed at a pleading that is no longer operative”). Dated: December 16, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?