Bazarewski et al v. Beaver Creek Ski Area, Inc et al

Filing 45

ORDER denying 43 Joint Motion to Stay the Case Pending the Court's Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/23/2013.(mjwcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-03218-RM-MJW WILLIAM BAZAREWSKI and HEATHER BAZAREWSKI, Plaintiff(s), v. THE VAIL CORPORATION d/b/a VAIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendant(s). MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Stay the Case Pending the Court’s Ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 43) is DENIED. Staying discovery pending the outcome of motions determining preliminary matters raises issues “of pretrial management and judicial efficiency that fall within the court’s discretion.” Stone v. Gonzales, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43885, *2 (D. Colo. June 18, 2006) (citing Greeley Pub. Co. v. Hergert, 233 F.R.D. 607, 612 (D. Colo. 2006). After taking into consideration the current posture of this case, the court finds that the interest of justice requires that this case go forward with discovery. Defendant assumes in the subject motion (docket no. 43) that Judge Moore will grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 18), but this court does not act on assumptions Date: October 23, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?