Carbajal et al v. Morrissey et al
Filing
248
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/28/15. Amended Motion for Leave to Have a Legal Box for Each of Plaintiff's Cases That He Is Presently Litigating Pro is DENIED as moot.(lgale, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03231-REB-KLM
DEAN CARBAJAL
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW KEEFER, in his individual capacity,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Leave to Have
a Legal Box for Each of Plaintiff’s Cases That He Is Presently Litigating Pro Se [#246]
(the “Motion”). Plaintiff seeks the same relief in each of the three civil cases presently
being litigated in federal court.1 See Motion [#659] in Civil Action No. 10-cv-02862-REBKLM; Motion [#324] in Civil Action No. 12-cv-02257-REB-KLM. Because Plaintiff seeks
additional legal boxes to house the alleged 9.5 cubic feet of legal documents generated
from his eight lawsuits, see Motion [#246] at 7, the issue may be resolved by making a
determination on any one of the motions pending in each of his cases. In other words, any
relief granted in two of Plaintiff’s cases would be redundant of any relief granted in his third
case. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#246] in this case is DENIED as moot.
An order determining Plaintiff’s request for additional legal boxes will issue in Civil Action
No. 10-cv-02862-REB-KLM in due course.
Dated: July 28, 2015
1
Plaintiff has one additional federal case pending, Civil Action No. 14-cv-02926-GPG, in
which he seeks a writ of habeas corpus. Plaintiff has not filed a motion pertaining to his request
for additional legal boxes in that case.
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?