Walker v. Health International Corporation, et al
Filing
68
MINUTE ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 65 Plaintiffs Second Motion to Amend the Complaint and to Change Case Caption to Remove Defendants Fitness Quest, Inc., Walgreens Co., Fingerhut Companies, Inc., and Meijer, Inc. and to Add Defendant Amazon.com, Inc., by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/8/2013.(ervsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03256-WJM-KLM
ANDRE WALKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
HEALTH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a Florida corporation,
HSN, INC., a Delaware corporation,
HSN INTERACTIVE LLC, a Delaware corporation,
WAL-MART CANADA CORP/LA COMPAGNIE WAL-MART DU CANADA, a Canadian N.S.
liability corporation, and
ROGERS BROADCASTING LIMITED, doing business as The Shopping Channel,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Amend the
Complaint and to Change Case Caption to Remove Defendants Fitness Quest, Inc.,
Walgreens Co., Fingerhut Companies, Inc., and Meijer, Inc. and to Add Defendant
Amazon.com, Inc. [Docket No. 65; Filed July 3, 2013] (the “Motion”). As an initial matter,
the Motion does not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A, which provides as follows:
The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before
filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to
confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter.
The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the
motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.
The Motion is subject to denial on this basis alone. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#65] is DENIED without prejudice.
Dated: July 8, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?