Cross v. Astrue
Filing
11
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/20/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/20/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 8/5/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/1/13. (sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03310-AP
MARK A. CROSS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
PATRICK C.H. SPENCER, II, Esq.
830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 320
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
(719) 632-4808
(719) 632-4807 (fax)
patrick@2spencers.com
For Defendant:
Jessica Milano
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 844-7136
(303) 844-0770 (fax)
jessica.milano@ssa.gov
-1-
2.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: December 19, 2012
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: January 9, 2013
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: March 11, 2013
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and
accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or
defenses.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. This case is not on
appeal from a decision issued on remand from this Court.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Counsel for both parties conferred and agreed upon the following proposed briefing schedule.
Due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s schedule and conflicts with commitments in other cases, the parties
have agreed to a briefing schedule outside the normal timeframes.
A.
B.
C.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: June 20, 2013
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: July 20, 2013
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: August 5, 2013
-2-
9.
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.
10.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.
B.
11.
(
)
(X)
All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 1st day of April, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
-3-
APPROVED:
s/Patrick C.H. Spencer, II
PATRICK C.H. SPENCER, II, Esq.
830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 320
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
(719) 632-4808
(719) 632-4807 (fax)
patrick@2spencers.com
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
Attorney for Plaintiff
s/ Jessica Milano
Jessica Milano
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 844-7136
(303) 844-0770 (fax)
jessica.milano@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?