Bourret v. Aspect Energy, LLC et al

Filing 71

Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 10/31/2013 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production Due to Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Request For in Camera Review Based on the Crime-Fra ud Exception 25 / 28 , is taken under advisement. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Interrogatory Answers 38 / 39 , is denied in part (production of AOL account emails that have not been already produced as discussed on record). Defendant's Oral motion to seal/restrict transcript of this hearing by Mr. Koclanes is denied. FTR: K. Terasaki. (rpmcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
October 31, 2013
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03320-RPM
JACQUES BOURRET,

Frances A. Koncilja
Richard P. Yetter

Plaintiff,
v.
ASPECT MANAGEMENT CORP.,
ASPECT HOLDINGS, LLC,
ASPECT ENERGY, LLC, and
ASPECT ENERGY INT.L, LLC,

Peter G. Koclanes
Gordon W. Netzorg

Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Motions to Compel
2:00 p.m.

Court in session.

Court’s preliminary remarks and states its understanding of the case.
Argument by Mr. Yetter [25]/[28].
Argument by Mr. Koclanes.
Court instructs Mr. Koclanes to organize redacted and unredacted documents (email chains) and
submit them to the Court, at the end of this hearing, for in camera review.
Argument by Mr. Yetter [38]/[39].
Argument by Mr. Koclanes.
ORDERED:

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production Due to Waiver of the Attorney-Client
Privilege and Request For in Camera Review Based on the Crime-Fraud Exception
[25]/[28], is taken under advisement.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Interrogatory Answers
[38]/[39], is denied in part (production of AOL account emails that have not been
already produced as discussed on record).
Defendant’s Oral motion to seal/restrict transcript of this hearing by Mr. Koclanes
is denied.

Mr. Koclanes identifies on record documents to be submitted for in camera review.
4:05 p.m.

Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 2 hrs. 05 min.