Castaneda v. El Padrino, Inc. et al

Filing 58

ORDER of Dismissal With Prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants El Padrino, Inc. and Bhagu Patel are dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay his, her or its own attorney feesand costs, except as provided in the parties Settlement Agreement. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 09/12/2014. (athom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 12-cv-03336-CMA-CBS GLADIS CASTANEDA, on her own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EL PADRINO, INC., and BHAGU PATEL, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. # 57), signed by the attorneys for the parties hereto, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants El Padrino, Inc. and Bhagu Patel are dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay his, her or its own attorney fees and costs, except as provided in the parties’ Settlement Agreement. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DATED: September 12 , 2014 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?