Woodrow v. Astrue

Filing 11

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/26/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/26/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 8/12/2013. By Judge John L. Kane on 5/20/13. (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-03356-AP DEBORAH M. WOODROW, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Rachael A. Lundy 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 Telephone: (719) 543-8636 Email: seckarlaw@mindspring.com For Defendant: Meghan Frei Berglind Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel 1001 17th Street Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 844-2544 Email: meghan.berglind@ssa.gov 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 1 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: February 26, 2013 C. 4. Date Complaint Was Filed: December 28, 2012 Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: April 26, 2013 STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD To the best of their knowledge, the parties believe the administrative record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not intend to submit additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS This case is not an appeal from a decision issued on remand. The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. B. Defendant’s Response Brief Due: July 26, 2013 C. 9. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: June 26, 2013 Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: August 12, 2013 STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument. 2 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE Indicate below the parties' consent choice. A. B. 11. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. ( X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. 3 DATED this 20th day of May, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. District Court Judge APPROVED: s/Rachael A. Lundy JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney RACHAEL A. LUNDY 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 Telephone: (719) 543-8636 seckarlaw@mindspring.com J. BENEDICT GARCÍA Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office District of Colorado Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Meghan Frei Berglind MEGHAN FREI BERGLIND Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 17th Street Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 844-2544 meghan.berglind@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?