Woodrow v. Astrue

Filing 11

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/26/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/26/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 8/12/2013. By Judge John L. Kane on 5/20/13. (mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03356-AP
DEBORAH M. WOODROW,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:
Rachael A. Lundy
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
For Defendant:
Meghan Frei Berglind
Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel
1001 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.

405(g).
1

3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: February 26, 2013

C.
4.

Date Complaint Was Filed: December 28, 2012

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: April 26, 2013

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of their knowledge, the parties believe the administrative record is complete

and accurate.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not intend to submit additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS
This case is not an appeal from a decision issued on remand. The parties have no other

matters to bring to the attention of the Court.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due: July 26, 2013

C.
9.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: June 26, 2013

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: August 12, 2013

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B.

Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

2

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.

B.

11.

( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
( X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S
CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.

3

DATED this 20th day of May, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. District Court Judge
APPROVED:
s/Rachael A. Lundy

JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney

RACHAEL A. LUNDY
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado

Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Meghan Frei Berglind
MEGHAN FREI BERGLIND
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

4