Barden v. King Soopers
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 61 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/16/2014. (cpear)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03373-RM-MEH
KING SOOPERS, a Colorado corporation,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 16, 2014.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Modify Scheduling Order [filed May 14, 2014; docket # 61] is denied
without prejudice for failure to adequately confer with opposing counsel, as required by D.C. Colo.
LCivR 7.1(a). See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) (because Rule
7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied by one party sending
the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?