Barden v. King Soopers

Filing 63

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 61 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/16/2014. (cpear)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-03373-RM-MEH GAYLA BARDEN, Plaintiff, v. KING SOOPERS, a Colorado corporation, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 16, 2014. Plaintiff’s Motion to Modify Scheduling Order [filed May 14, 2014; docket # 61] is denied without prejudice for failure to adequately confer with opposing counsel, as required by D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1(a). See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?