Maestas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
8
Amended ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 9/4/2013 at 10:30 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on August 29, 2013, lead counsel present in person and no parties permitted. Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days before the scheduling conference, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/12/2013. (rpmcd) (Main Document 8 replaced on 7/12/2013 to indicate Amended a.m.) (rpmcd).
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03378-RPM
ROBERT MAESTAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________________
Amended ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
____________________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is
ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on September 4, 2013, at 10:30 a.m.
in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout
Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation of
Scheduling Order which may be found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx
(Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions
(Rev. 11/11). The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers
by 4:00 p.m. on August 29, 2013. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in
person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend.
Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days
before the scheduling conference.
Dated: July 12th, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?