Dedmon v. Chelsea Food Services et al
Filing
109
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/1/15 re: Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion for Order to Deem Admitted Unanswered Requests for Admissions 104 , and Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Sixth and Seventh Supplemental Disclosures 106 . The Motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00005-WJM-NYW
CAROLYN DEDMON
Plaintiff,
v.
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.,
UNITED AIR LINES, INC., and
UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This civil action comes before the court on Defendants Continental Airlines, Inc.
(“Continental”), United Airlines, Inc. (“United”) and United Continental Holdings, Inc. (“UCH”)
(collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion for Order to
Deem Admitted Unanswered Requests for Admissions, filed on June 30, 2015 [#104], and
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Sixth and
Seventh Supplemental Disclosures, filed on June 30, 2015 [#106] (collectively, the “Motions”).
Pursuant to the Memorandum dated June 30, 2015 [#108], the Motions are before this Magistrate
Judge.
The court reminds the Parties of their presumptive duty under the Local Rules to meetand-confer in advance of the filing of a motion, and to include sufficient description and/or
certification of same. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1. The court is at present unable to ascertain whether
Defendants sought to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1, or are excused from compliance as to
the Motions at issue. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
DATED: July 1, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?