Dedmon v. Chelsea Food Services et al
Filing
113
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/7/15 re: Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion for Order to Deem Admitted Unanswered Requests for Admissions 109 and Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Reply in S upport of Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Sixth and Seventh Supplemental Disclosures 110 . The Motions are GRANTED. Defendants have up to and including 7/17/2015 to file reply briefs. The court will entertain oral argument on the motions on 7/31/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00005-WJM-NYW
CAROLYN DEDMON,
Plaintiff,
v.
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.,
UNITED AIR LINES, INC., and
UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This civil action comes before the court on Defendants Continental Airlines, Inc.
(“Continental”), United Airlines, Inc. (“United”) and United Continental Holdings, Inc. (“UCH”)
(collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion for Order to
Deem Admitted Unanswered Requests for Admissions, filed on July 2, 2015 [#109], and
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Sixth and
Seventh Supplemental Disclosures, filed on July 2, 2015 [#110] (collectively, the “Motions”).
Pursuant to the Memorandum dated July 6, 2015 [#112], the Motions are before this Magistrate
Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that
Defendants may have up to and including July 17, 2015 to file reply briefs in support of their
Motion for Order to Deem Admitted Unanswered Requests for Admissions and Motion to Strike
Plaintiff’s Sixth and Seventh Supplemental Disclosures. The court will entertain oral argument
on the underlying motions on July 31, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
DATED: July 7, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?