Dedmon v. Chelsea Food Services et al
Filing
35
CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/18/14. (Simmons, B.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00005-WJM-BNB
CAROLYN DEDMON
Plaintiff,
v.
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.,
UNITED AIR LINES, INC., and
UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ “Joint Motion for Entry of
Confidentiality Agreement and Stipulated Protective Order.” The Court, having reviewed the
Motion and being fully apprised in the premises, finds that the Motion is meritorious and
acceptable, and hereby orders that the terms and conditions of this Confidentiality Agreement
and Stipulated Protective Order (“Protective Order”) be ENTERED as follows:
1.
Preface: In this action, at least one of the “Parties” (as defined below) has sought
and/or is seeking “Confidential Information” (as defined below). The Parties also anticipate
seeking additional Confidential Information during discovery and that there will be questioning
concerning Confidential Information in the course of depositions, at hearings, or at trial. The
Parties assert the disclosure of such information outside the scope of this litigation could result in
significant injury to one or more of the Parties’ business or privacy interests or result in a
violation of state and federal privacy laws. As such, the Parties have agreed to the terms of and
request the Court enter the following Protective Order for the purpose of preventing the improper
and otherwise harmful disclosure and use of Confidential Information except as set forth herein.
The Court hereby grants the request, having found good cause for same, and enters the following
terms as an order of the Court under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).
2.
General Scope: This Protective Order shall apply to all documents and other
protectable information containing or designated as containing Confidential Information as
defined below, including without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories,
responses to requests for admission, deposition, hearing, or trial testimony, and any other
information produced or disclosed pursuant to the disclosure or discovery obligations posed or
created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the above-captioned litigation. Access to any
such materials will be limited to “Authorized Persons” as set forth below.
3.
Definition of Confidential Information: “Confidential Information” means any
document, file, portions of files, transcribed testimony, or response to a discovery request,
including any extract, abstract, chart, summary, note, or copy made therefrom - not made
available to the public - containing confidential personal and business information, including but
not limited to medical information, sensitive business or personal financial information, trade secrets,
customer lists, proprietary information, employment and personnel records, personally identifying
information, and/or other material of a sensitive nature, information that a party is legally obligated to
preserve as confidential under applicable state or federal privacy laws, or any other information or
items that are entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. It does not include information
that has been voluntarily disclosed in the public domain.
2
4.
Designation Procedures: Where Confidential Information is produced, provided
or otherwise disclosed by a Party in response to any discovery request, during a deposition, at a
court hearing, or at trial, it may be designated as being within the scope of this order in the
following manner:
a. By imprinting the word “Confidential” on the first page or cover of any
document produced;
b. By imprinting the word “Confidential” next to or above any response to a
discovery request; and/or
c. With respect to transcribed testimony (including depositions or court
transcripts and any exhibits relating thereto), either by making a specific
designation on the record prior to or during the testimony to be designated or,
alternatively, by giving written notice to opposing counsel designating such
portions as “Confidential” by page and line number no later than thirty (30)
calendar days after receipt of the transcribed testimony; provided, however,
that until such time has elapsed, the entirety of the transcribed testimony will
be deemed confidential.
5.
Inadvertent Non-Designation or Production: In the event that a Party to this
litigation inadvertently fails to designate material as confidential, that Party may make such a
designation later by notifying all Parties to whom such material was produced, in writing, as
soon as practicable. After receipt of such notification, the parties to whom production has been
made shall treat the designated material as confidential. Similarly, inadvertent production by
any Party of a document containing attorney-client communications, attorney work product,
3
other privileged information, confidential information, trade secrets or proprietary information
shall not constitute a waiver of privilege. Any such document and any copies made of it shall be
returned to the producing party immediately upon its request.
6.
Restrictions on Use: All Confidential Information provided by a Party in
response to a discovery request or in the form of transcribed testimony shall be subject to the
following restrictions:
a. Confidential Information (including any copies or summaries thereof) shall be
used only for the purpose of the above-captioned litigation and not for any
business or other purpose whatsoever;
b. Confidential Information shall not be communicated or disclosed to anyone
except other than to “Authorized Persons” as defined below, and all such
persons shall be bound by all terms of this Protective Order as if a party to this
lawsuit;
c. Confidential Information shall not be communicated or disclosed to anyone
falling into the category of “Conflicts of Interest” as defined below under any
circumstances;
d. Individuals authorized to review or receive Confidential Information pursuant
to this Protective Order shall hold said Confidential Information in confidence
and shall not divulge the Confidential Information, either verbally or in
writing, in response to any third party request or to any government agency or
court, except as provided herein; and
4
e. Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent the Parties from using
information or documents produced by a producing party pursuant to this
Protective Order during mediation, arbitration, deposition, trial or any other
proceeding in this litigation.
7.
Authorized Persons: The Parties (or attorneys for either) in the above-captioned
litigation may distribute protected materials or share information obtained from protected
materials with the following categories of persons, and no other, except by further order of the
Court:
a. The “Parties” to the above-captioned litigation (collectively or individually),
including Plaintiff Carolyn Dedmon and Defendants Continental Airlines,
Inc., United Airlines, Inc. and United Continental Holdings, Inc.;
b. Counsel advising the Parties and members of their legal or support staffs;
c. Consultants, investigators, experts and their staff retained by the Parties or
their attorneys in connection with this litigation;
d. Non-parties specifically retained in connection with this action to assist in
photocopying, imaging, database development, graphics, or design services;
e. The Court and Court personnel, including stenographic reporters engaged in
any Court or judicial proceedings as are necessary incident to the preparation
or trial of this litigation; and
f. Such other persons as the parties to this Protective Order shall agree to in
writing or the Court shall determine.
5
8.
Conflicts of Interest: Confidential Information (including copies, descriptions or
disclosures of the contents thereof) shall not, under any circumstances, be provided to any person
or entity who has a conflict of interest with one or more of the Parties, which includes:
a. Any competitor of the producing Party or any known agent, consultant or
affiliate thereof, or any attorney, if a Party knows that that person is employed
by or expects to be employed by any competitor of the producing party;
b. Any person or entity (or that person’s or entity’s attorney) that a Party knows
or has reason to know has or may have any claim against the producing party
or any of its affiliates.
c. Subsections (a) and (b) of this paragraph shall not prevent the disclosure of
documents to experts retained by a Party pursuant to section 7(c) above.
9.
Counsel Duties and Obligations: Counsel for the Parties shall be responsible for
providing a copy of this Protective Order (including the Non-Disclosure Agreement represented
by “Exhibit A” thereto) to each person who is to receive protected material pursuant to this
Protective Order and must receive a signed copy of Exhibit A prior to disclosing any protected
material to each such person. Counsel for the Party who discloses Confidential Information will
also be responsible for assuring compliance with the terms of this Protective Order with respect
to persons to whom such Confidential Information is disclosed and shall retain the NonDisclosure Agreements signed by all recipients of Confidential Information. During the
pendency of this litigation, counsel shall also retain custody of Confidential Information, and
copies made therefrom.
6
10.
Objections to Designation:
A party may object to the designation of
particular Confidential Information by giving written notice to the party designating the
disputed information. The written notice shall identify the information to which the
objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve the objection within ten (10) business days
after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the
Confidential Information to file an appropriate motion requesting that the court determine
whether the disputed information should be subject to the terms of this Protective Order.
If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed information shall be treated as Confidential
Information under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion.
If the designating party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed time, the disputed
information shall lose its designation as Confidential Information and shall not thereafter
be treated as Confidential Information in accordance with this Protective Order. In
connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the Confidential
Information shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed
information to be treated as Confidential Information.
If opposing counsel objects to the designation of certain information as Confidential
Information, he or she shall promptly inform the designating Party’s counsel in writing of the
specific grounds of objection to the designation. Counsel shall then, in good faith and on an
informal basis, attempt to resolve such dispute. If after such good faith attempt, counsel is
unable to resolve their dispute, opposing counsel may move for a disclosure order consistent
with this order. Any motion for disclosure shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of receipt by
counsel of notice of opposing counsel's objection, and the information shall continue to have
7
Confidential Information status from the time it is produced until the ruling by the Court on the
motion.
11.
Use of Confidential Information in Court Proceedings: In the event Confidential
Information is used in any court filing or proceeding in this action, including but not limited to
its use at trial, it shall not lose its confidential status as between the parties through such use.
Confidential Information and pleadings or briefs quoting or discussing Confidential Information
will not be accepted for filing “under seal” or otherwise kept out of the public record in this
action, however, except by court order issued upon motion of the party seeking to file the
documents under seal. Any motion requesting leave to restrict access file documents under
seal shall comply with the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 and demonstrate that
the Confidential Information at issue is entitled to protection under the standards
articulated in therein as well as under applicable case law.
12.
Third Party Requests for Disclosure: In the event that a Party or person who has
received Confidential Information (a) is served with a request for production of documents or
interrogatories in another action (“discovery requests”), (b) is served with a subpoena in another
action, (c) is served with a demand in another action to which he/she/it is a party, or (d) is served
with any other legal process by one not a party to this litigation, seeking proprietary or
confidential information, that Party or person shall give prompt written notice of such event to
counsel of record for the producing party and shall object to its production. Upon receipt of
written notice, the producing party shall advise the party that is to respond to the discovery
requests, subpoena or demand of the producing party’s position. Thereafter, the producing party
shall assume responsibility for preserving and prosecuting any objection to the discovery
8
requests, subpoena or demand. The party served shall be obligated to cooperate to the extent
necessary to preserve the confidentiality of the proprietary or confidential information. Should
the person or entity seeking access to the confidential or proprietary information take action to
enforce such discovery requests, subpoena, demand, or other legal process, the party so served
shall set forth in his/her/its response the existence of the Protective Order. Nothing herein shall
be construed as requiring the receiving party to challenge or appeal any order requiring
production of proprietary or confidential information, or to subject himself/herself/itself to any
penalties for noncompliance with any legal process or order, or to seek any relief from the Court.
13.
No Presumption as to Authenticity, Admissibility, or Confidentiality: By entering
this Protective Order, the Court does not intend to create any presumption with regard to the
authenticity, admissibility, or actual confidentiality of any material produced or disclosed
pursuant to it, or to alter the normal burden of proof necessary for obtaining a protective order
from the Court. Any dispute among the Parties as to the confidentiality of any specific material
shall be resolved as provided herein.
14.
Obligations Upon Termination of Litigation:
a. Parties: Within 120 days after final conclusion of all aspects of this litigation,
Confidential Information and all copies of same (other than exhibits of record)
shall be returned to the producing party’s attorneys or, at the option of the
producing party, destroyed. Each Party or Party’s attorney shall furnish an
affidavit certifying compliance herewith and shall deliver the same to counsel
for the producing party not more than 120 days after final termination of this
litigation.
9
b. Experts: With the exception of experts who are retained but not identified to
testify (“consulting experts”), the Parties shall provide the producing party
with a copy of each signed Nondisclosure Agreement (Exhibit A) within 30
days after final conclusion of all aspects of this litigation. Further, within said
time, the receiving party shall also provide the producing party with an
affidavit from each recipient of protected materials confirming that the
recipient has not disseminated protected materials to anyone, that he/she has
returned all protected materials to Plaintiff or the Defendants, and that he/she
has not retained any copies of any protected materials. In instances where a
Party has retained any consulting experts, the Party shall provide the
producing party with a written statement within the time described above that
the attorneys have received an affidavit from each consulting expert
confirming that the consulting expert has not disseminated protected material
to anyone, that he/she has returned all protected material to the attorneys for
the Party, and that the consulting expert has not retained any copies of any
protected material.
15.
Modification(s): Nothing in this Protective Order shall preclude any Party from
filing a motion seeking further or different protection from the Court under Rule 26(c) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or from filing a motion with respect to the manner in which
Confidential Information shall be treated at trial.
16.
Duration of Order: The termination of this action shall not relieve counsel or
other persons obligated hereunder from their responsibility to maintain the confidentiality of
10
Confidential Information pursuant to this Protective Order, and the Court shall retain continuing
jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Protective Order. This Protective Order shall remain in
effect unless modified by an Order of the Court or by written stipulation of the Parties filed with
the court. Should the Court subsequently enter a Protective Order binding all Parties to this
litigation, the present Order shall cease to have effect.
Dated February 18, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
STIPULATED AND APPROVED
/s/ Christopher K. Gilbert________
/s/ Brian T. Maye
Christopher K. Gilbert
Brian T. Maye
4100 E. Mississippi Ave., Ste. 1900
Adler Murphy & McQuillen LLP
Denver, Colorado 80246
20 S. Clark Street, Suite 2500
Tel: 303-999-9999
Chicago, IL 60603
Fax: 303-320-1915
Tel: 312-422-5713
cgilbert@coloradolawyers.com
Fax: 312-345-9860
bmaye@amm-law.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Thomas E.M. Werge
Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell LLP
370 Seventeenth St., Ste. 4500
Denver, Colorado 80202-5647
Tel: 303-244-1800
Fax: 303-244-1879
werge@wtotrial.com
Attorneys for Defendants
11
___
EXHIBIT A
I,______________________________________________________, declare as follows:
1.
I understand that the information and/or documents to be provided to me identified
as confidential are subject to a Stipulation and Order Regarding Confidentiality in the court action
titled CAROLYN DEDMON v. CONTINENTIAL AIRLINES, INC., et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-00005WJM-BNB, currently pending in United States District Court for the District of Colorado
(hereinafter “this litigation”) and constitute confidential information that is to be used only for the
purpose of this litigation. I understand that said information is not to be disclosed by me to anyone
nor used for any purpose other than this litigation.
2
I have read the Stipulation and Order Regarding Confidentiality entered in this
litigation and agree to be bound by its terms. I understand that I may not in any way disseminate
any confidential information received by me in the course of this litigation in any way not prescribed
by the Stipulation and Order Regarding Confidentiality. I further understand that I must return all
copies of confidential information upon request at the conclusion of this matter.
3.
I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of any court that may have jurisdiction over this
litigation and/or any proceedings to enforce the terms of the Stipulation and Order Regarding
Confidentiality against me, whether by way of contempt of court, by a civil action for injunction and
monetary damages, or otherwise.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at ____________________________, this ___ day of _________________, 20__.
____________________________________
12
13
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?