Prochnow et al v. Fidelity Mortgage Company, Inc
MINUTE ORDER. Defendants Motion to Dismiss 7 is DENIED as moot. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/27/2013.(cmacd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00036-PAB-KLM
JARED PROCHNOW, and
FIDELITY MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.,
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 7;
Filed January 14, 2013] (the “Motion”). The Motion was directed at Plaintiffs’ original
Complaint [#5]. On January 29, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint [#9].
Defendant has since filed a new Motion to Dismiss [#12] aimed at the Amended Complaint.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#7] is DENIED as moot. See, e.g.,
Strich v. United States, No. 09-cv-01913-REB-KLM, 2010 WL 14826, at *1 (D. Colo. Jan.
11, 2010) (citations omitted) (“The filing of an amended complaint moots a motion to
dismiss directed at the complaint that is supplanted and superseded.”); Gotfredson v.
Larsen LP, 432 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1172 (D. Colo. 2006) (noting that defendants’ motions
to dismiss are “technically moot because they are directed at a pleading that is no longer
Dated: February 27, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?