Hamilton v. USA

Filing 57

COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 7/7/2015 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Protective Order Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)(1) and Incorporated Memorandum of Law 45 is DENIED. Plaintiff is required to respond to Defendants discovery requests, limited to tax years 2003 through 2006, as discussed. Plaintiff shall produce the documents to Defendant on or before August 21, 2015. The following deadlines are extended: Discovery Cut off October 2, 2015; Dispositive Motions November 2, 2015. FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No: Courtroom Deputy: 13-cv-00051-REB-KMT Sabrina Grimm Date: July 7, 2015 FTR: Courtroom C-201 Parties: Counsel: ROBERT S. HAMILTON, Larry Harvey Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Rick Watson Defendant. COURTROOM MINUTES MOTION HEARING 1:24 p.m. Court in session. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion and argument regarding restricted consent, charitable contribution of easements, refund suit, notice of deficiency, and adjustments. ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Protective Order Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)(1) and Incorporated Memorandum of Law [45] is DENIED. Plaintiff is required to respond to Defendant’s discovery requests, limited to tax years 2003 through 2006, as discussed. Plaintiff shall produce the documents to Defendant on or before August 21, 2015. ORDERED: The following deadlines are extended: Discovery Cut off – October 2, 2015 Dispositive Motions – November 2, 2015 2:09 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total in-court time 00:45 *To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?