Hamilton v. USA
Filing
60
ORDER Overruling Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge Tafoya's July 7, 2015 Order 58 . By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/4/2015. (mlace, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00051-REB-KMT
ROBERT S. HAMILTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant.
ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION
TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE TAFOYA’S July 7, 2015 ORDER
Blackburn, J.
The matter before me is the Plaintiff’s Objection to Magistrate Judge
Tafoya’s July 7, 2015 Order [#58],1 filed July 17, 2015. I overrule the objection.
Defendant’s objections pertain to non-dispositive matters that were referred to
the magistrate judge for resolution. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(a), I may modify or set aside any portion of a magistrate judge’s order which I find to
be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s order;
the apposite motion, response, and reply and plaintiff’s objections and defendant’s
corresponding response thereto, I conclude that the magistrate judge’s order is not
clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
1
“[#58]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the objections stated in Plaintiff’s
Objection to Magistrate Judge Tafoya’s July 7, 2015 Order [#58], filed July 17, 2015,
are overruled.
Dated August 4, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?