Freeman v. Arapahoe House et al

Filing 74

MINUTE ORDER that Defendant City of Auroras Motion to Vacate Minute Order Doc. 71 RE: Expedited Motion for Protective Order and Request for Provision of Location for Aurora Police Officer Depositions Within the Federal Courthouse for the District of Colorado Doc. 61 Docket No. 72 is granted. Accordingly, it is further ORDERED that this courts Minute Order docketed yesterday as Docket No. 71 is VACATED; Defendant City of Auroras Expedited Motion for Protective Order and Request for Provisions of Location for Aurora Police Officer Depositions Within the Federal Courthouse for the District of Colorado Docket No. 61 is DENIED AS MOOT, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/5/2013.(ervsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-00064-WJM-MJW HEATHER FREEMAN, Plaintiff(s), v. ARAPAHOE HOUSE, a non-profit corporation; CONRAD CICHOS, in his official and individual capacity, MATTHEW BRUKBACHER, in his official and individual capacity, CRAIG HESS, in his official and individual capacity, and The CITY OF AURORA, a municipality, Defendant(s). MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant City of Aurora’s Motion to Vacate Minute Order (Doc. 71) RE: Expedited Motion for Protective Order and Request for Provision of Location for Aurora Police Officer Depositions Within the Federal Courthouse for the District of Colorado (Doc. 61) [Docket No. 72] is granted. Accordingly, it is further ORDERED that this court’s Minute Order docketed yesterday as Docket No. 71 is VACATED, and it is further ORDERED that the Defendant City of Aurora’s Expedited Motion for Protective Order and Request for Provisions of Location for Aurora Police Officer Depositions Within the Federal Courthouse for the District of Colorado (Docket No. 61) is DENIED AS MOOT. Date: November 5, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?