National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Intrawest ULC et al
MINUTE ORDER denying as moot Engelberth Construction, Inc.'s 45 Motion to Dismiss. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/12/2014.(klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00079-PAB-KMT
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA,
INTRAWEST ULC f/k/a Intrawest Corporation,
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,
INTRAWEST ULC f/k/a INTRAWEST CORPORATION,
Third Party Plaintiff,
WILLIS NORTH AMERICA, INC. f/k/a WILLIS CORROON CORPORATION,
WILLIS OF NEW YORK, INC.,
WILLIS INSURANCE BROKERAGE OF UTAH, INC.,
WILLIS OF NEW JERSEY, INC.,
WILLIS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY f/k/a Willis
Corroon Construction Services Corporation of New Jersey,
WILLIS CORROON CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CORPORATION OF
WILLIS CORROON CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CORPORATION,
WILLIS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC. f/k/a Willis Corroon Corporation of New
WILLIS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC., and
JOHN DOE WILLIS ENTITY,
Third Party Defendants.
Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer
This matter is before the Court on Engelberth Construction, Inc.’s Motion to
Dismiss [Docket No. 45] filed by Engelberth Construction, Inc. (“Engelberth”). On April
26, 2013, Engelberth filed a motion to intervene [Docket No. 44], which the magistrate
judge denied without prejudice [Docket No. 58]. On May 3, 2013, Engelberth filed a
second motion to intervene [Docket No. 65]. On February 6, 2014, Engelberth withdrew
its second motion to intervene, stating that it “no longer wishes to participate in the
litigation.” Docket No. 195 at 2. Because Engelberth no longer seeks to intervene in
this case, it is therefore
ORDERED that Engelberth Construction, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No.
45] is DENIED as moot.
Dated February 12, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?