National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Intrawest ULC et al

Filing 304

COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 1/7/2015 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Plaintiff/Counter Defendant's Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order 279 is denied as MOOT. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.'s Motion for Protective Order Regarding Intrawest ULCs Supplemental Request for Production 285 is DENIED. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.'s Motion to Compel Federal Insurance Companys Responses to Interrogatories, Production of Documents, and Supporting Memoramdum (sic) of Law 281 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.'s Motion to Compel Third-Party Defendant Willis Entiti es' Responses to Interrogatories and Production of Documents and Memorandum of Law in Support 282 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Motion for Limited Protective Order 277 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FTR: KMT C201. (sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No: Courtroom Deputy: 13-cv-00079-PAB-KMT Sabrina Grimm Date: January 7, 2015 FTR: Courtroom C-201 Parties: Counsel: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Joseph Lang Paul Motz Douglas Stevens Plaintiff, v. INTRAWEST ULC f/k/a INTRAWEST CORPORATION, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Kellie Fetter Brett Godfrey Kelly Dugas Cathleen Heintz Michael O’Bresley Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES MOTIONS HEARING 10:09 a.m. Court in session. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Also present, David Satnick, for Third Party Defendant Willis of New York. Discussion regarding the number of depositions. Court clarifies that each party group is allowed 10 depositions against each other party group. ORDERED: Plaintiff/Counter Defendant’s Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [279] is denied as MOOT. Discussion and argument regarding additional documents, beyond the underwriting files, that would be responsive to Intrawest’s supplemental request for production in dispute. ORDERED: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.’s Motion for Protective Order Regarding Intrawest ULC’s Supplemental Request for Production [285] is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to provide a supplemental response to Intrawest on or before January 28, 2015, as discussed. Discussion and argument regarding Federal’s alleged withholding of reserve information, production of payment data, premiums, third amended privilege log, alleged improper description and designation of documents, policy limits per project or aggregate total, the requirement of Endorsement 9 to change the policy limits, and sanctions. 11:58 a.m. 1:07 p.m. Court in recess. Court in session. ORDERED: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.’s Motion to Compel Federal Insurance Company’s Responses to Interrogatories, Production of Documents, and Supporting Memoramdum (sic) of Law [281] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendant Federal is directed to produce to Plaintiff a supplemental privilege log, any additional documents that will not continue to be designated as privileged, and documents pertaining to reserve and premium information on or before January 19, 2015, as represented and discussed in Court. Defendant Federal’s objections are sustained as to the production of payment information and sanctions. Discussion and argument regarding responses by Willis to interrogatories 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Court finds interrogatories 3, 4, and 5 are overbroad and interrogatory 6 is irrelevant. ORDERED: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.’s Motion to Compel Third-Party Defendant Willis Entities’ Responses to Interrogatories and Production of Documents and Memorandum of Law in Support [282] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendant Willis is directed to produce a narrative or documents responsive to interrogatory 7 and request for production 4, as limited by the Court. The motion is denied in all other respects. 2:26 p.m. 2:48 p.m. Court in recess. Court in session. Discussion and argument regarding National Union’s 30(b)(6) deposition. ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Limited Protective Order [277] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as stated on record. 2 Further discussion regarding objections during a deposition and extending case scheduling deadlines. 3:40 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total in-court time 04:00 *To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?