National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Intrawest ULC et al

Filing 456

ORDER granting 450 National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA's Unopposed Motion for Issuance of Letter Rogatory, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/29/15.(sgrim)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLORADO

No. 1:13-cv-00079-PAB-KMT
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.,
Plaintiff and Intervenor Defendant,
v.
INTRAWEST ULC f/k/a INTRAWEST CORPORATION,
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendants, and
INTRAWEST U.S. HOLDINGS, INC.,
INTRAWEST RESORTS, INC.,
UPPER BENCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
INTRAWEST CALIFORNIA HOLDINGS, INC.,
SIERRA STAR THREE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
THE STRATTON CORPORATION, and
INTRAWEST STRATTON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
Intervenor Plaintiffs,
INTRAWEST ULC f/k/a INTRAWEST CORPORATION,
Third-Party Plaintiff
v.
WILLIS NORTH AMERICA, INC. f/k/a WILLIS CORROON CORPORATION,
WILLIS OF NEW YORK, INC.,
WILLIS INSURANCE BROKERAGE OF UTAH, INC.,
WILLIS OF NEW JERSEY, INC.,
WILLIS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY f/k/a WILLIS
CORROON CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY,
WILLIS CORROON CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CORPORATION OF CONNECTICUT,
WILLIS CORROON CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CORPORATION,
WILLIS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC. f/k/a WILLIS CORROON CORPORATION OF
NEW HAMPSHIRE, and
WILLIS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC.,
Third-Party Defendants.

_______________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF LETTER ROGATORY
________________________________________________________________________
Upon consideration of the Unopposed Motion for Issuance of Letter Rogatory (Doc. No.
450) concerning discovery from Daniel Jarvis filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company
of Pittsburgh, Pa., the Court finds that: (1) Mr. Jarvis possesses discoverable information
relevant to the claims and defenses in this lawsuit; (2) the information and documents identified
in proposed letter rogatory attached to the Motion as Exhibit A are discoverable information and
documents relevant to the claims and defenses in this lawsuit; and (3) there is no good cause why
the requested letter rogatory should not be issued. Accordingly, the Motion (Doc. No. 450)
should be and is hereby GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFOR ORDERED that, contemporaneously with the entry of this Order, the
Court shall issue a letter rogatory in the form attached to the Motion as Exhibit A.
Dated this 29th day of July, 2015.

__________________________________________
Kathleen M. Tafoya
United States Magistrate Judge

2