National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Intrawest ULC et al

Filing 505

COURTROOM MINUTES for Telephonic Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/24/2015. Granting for the reasons stated on the record 501 Defendants' Motion to Quash and for a Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(c)(1)(A) Preventing the Deposition of Geoffrey Hall. FTR: Courtroom C-201. (ebuch)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No: Courtroom Deputy: 13-cv-00079-PAB-KMT Emily Buchanan Date: September 24, 2015 FTR: Courtroom C-201 Parties: Counsel: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Joseph Lang Plaintiff, v. INTRAWEST ULC f/k/a INTRAWEST CORPORATION, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Kellie Fetter NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Michael O’Bresly Anne Nolte Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING 1:38 p.m. Court in session. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Also present, David Satnick, for Third Party Defendants. Discussion regarding Defendants’ Motion to Quash and for a Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(c)(1)(A) Preventing the Deposition of Geoffrey Hall. 1:40 p.m. Argument by Ms. Fetter. 1:43 p.m. Response by Mr. Lang. 1:46 p.m. Statement by Mr. Satnick. 1:48 p.m. Statement by Mr. O’Bresly. Statements by the Court. 1:56 p.m. Further response by Mr. Lang. ORDERED: Defendants’ Motion to Quash and for a Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(c)(1)(A) Preventing the Deposition of Geoffrey Hall (Doc. No. 501 – filed September 23, 2015) is GRANTED for the reasons stated on the record. 1:59 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total in-court time: 00:21 *To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Stevens-Koenig Reporting at 303-988-8470. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?