National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Intrawest ULC et al
Filing
505
COURTROOM MINUTES for Telephonic Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/24/2015. Granting for the reasons stated on the record 501 Defendants' Motion to Quash and for a Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 26(c)(1)(A) Preventing the Deposition of Geoffrey Hall. FTR: Courtroom C-201. (ebuch)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No:
Courtroom Deputy:
13-cv-00079-PAB-KMT
Emily Buchanan
Date: September 24, 2015
FTR: Courtroom C-201
Parties:
Counsel:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
OF PITTSBURGH, PA,
Joseph Lang
Plaintiff,
v.
INTRAWEST ULC f/k/a INTRAWEST
CORPORATION,
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Kellie Fetter
NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
HARTFORD, and
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,
Michael O’Bresly
Anne Nolte
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES
TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING
1:38 p.m.
Court in session.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Also present, David Satnick, for Third Party Defendants.
Discussion regarding Defendants’ Motion to Quash and for a Protective Order Pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. Pro. 26(c)(1)(A) Preventing the Deposition of Geoffrey Hall.
1:40 p.m.
Argument by Ms. Fetter.
1:43 p.m.
Response by Mr. Lang.
1:46 p.m.
Statement by Mr. Satnick.
1:48 p.m.
Statement by Mr. O’Bresly.
Statements by the Court.
1:56 p.m.
Further response by Mr. Lang.
ORDERED: Defendants’ Motion to Quash and for a Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
Pro. 26(c)(1)(A) Preventing the Deposition of Geoffrey Hall (Doc. No. 501 – filed
September 23, 2015) is GRANTED for the reasons stated on the record.
1:59 p.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded.
Total in-court time: 00:21
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Stevens-Koenig Reporting at 303-988-8470.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?