National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Intrawest ULC et al
Filing
85
ORDER granting 81 Defendant Federal Insurance Company's Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaims. Defendant Federal Insurance Company shall file its Amended Answer in Opposition to Plaintiff's Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Counterclaims for Reimbursement no later than 10/7/2013. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/2/13.(mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 13–cv–00079–PAB–KMT
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTRAWEST ULC f/k/a INTRAWEST CORPORATION,
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the court on “Defendant Federal Insurance Company’s Motion for
Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaims” (Doc. No. 81, filed June 20, 2013). No
responses or replies have been filed.
A Court must heed Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15’s mandate that the Court should
“freely give leave when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a); see also Foman v. Davis, 371
U.S. 178, 182 (1962); Duncan v. Manager, Dep’t of Safety, City and Cnty. of Denver, 397 F.3d
1300, 1315 (10th Cir. 2005). The grant or denial of leave to amend is committed to the
discretion of the district court. See Duncan, 397 F.3d at 1315. “If the underlying facts or
circumstances relied upon by a [party] may be a proper subject of relief, he ought to be afforded
an opportunity to test his claim on the merits.” Foman, 371 U.S. at 182. Leave to amend should
be refused “only on a showing of undue delay, undue prejudice to the opposing party, bad faith
or dilatory motive, failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, or futility of
amendment.” Duncan, 397 F.3d at 1315; see also Foman, 371 U.S. at 182.
Defendant Federal Insurance Company seeks to amend its answer and counterclaims to
assert counterclaims seeking reimbursement of sums recently committed in settlement of claims
that should fall within the primary layer of insurance coverage underwritten by Plaintiff.
Defendant explains that, at the time of the filing of their Answer, Federal had not yet paid or
committed to pay any sums that would have fallen within the primary layer of the OCIP insured
by Plaintiff. Recently, however, Federal committed to pay certain sums in settlement of claims
against insureds thereunder in connection with a civil action styled Eagle Run at Juniper Springs
Owners Association v. Upper Bench Development Corporation, et al., Case No. 16960 (the
“Eagle Run Lawsuit”), pending in Mono County Superior Court in Mono County, California.
The relevant sums are due, according to the settlement agreement entered therein, on or before
July 16, 2013. Once those sums have been paid, Federal will have an actual financial interest in
pursuit of claims for reimbursement arising under Colorado’s doctrine of equitable subrogation
and related theories of recovery and causes of action. Defendant also seeks to amend to assert
affirmative defenses of equitable reformation and judicial reformation premised upon the
reasonable expectations doctrine and the doctrines of equitable and promissory estoppel.
This court set the deadline for amendment of pleadings at June 20, 2013. (Doc. No. 67.)
Thus, the motion is timely. The court has reviewed Defendant’s motion to amend and proposed
2
amended answer and counterclaims the finds no evidence of undue delay, undue prejudice, bad
faith or dilatory motive, failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, or
futility of amendment. Moreover, the motion is unopposed.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that “Defendant Federal Insurance Company’s Motion for Leave to File
Amended Answer and Counterclaims” (Doc. No. 81) is GRANTED. Defendant Federal
Insurance Company shall file its Amended Answer in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Complaint for
Declaratory Judgment and Counterclaims for Reimbursement no later than October 7, 2013.
Dated this 2nd day of October, 2013.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?