Baker v. Astrue

Filing 12

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 6/3/2013. SS Defendants Brief due by 7/3/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 7/18/2013, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/24/13. (sgrim)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00101-AP
ROGER BAKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Gail C. Harriss
GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC
450 S. Camino del Rio, Suite 201
Durango, CO 81301
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT. GARCIA
Assistant United States Attorney
M. THAYNE WARNER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: January 16, 2013
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: February 6, 2013
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: April 4, 2013
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of the parties’ knowledge, the Administrative Record is complete.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Plaintiff states: None anticipated.
Defendant states: None anticipated.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
Plaintiff states: To the best of his knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims
or defenses.
Defendant states: To the best of her knowledge, this case does not involve unusual
claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
This case involves no prior judicial involvement. No other matters are anticipated.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: June 3, 2013
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: July 3, 2013
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: July 18, 2013
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Oral Argument is not requested.
B. Defendant's Statement: Oral Argument is not requested.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.

( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.

B.

(X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United
States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY
OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT,
ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a
showing of good cause.
DATED this 24th day of April, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
__________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
For Plaintiff:
s/ Gail C. Harriss
By: Gail C. Harriss
GAIL C. HARRISS, LLC
450 S. Camino del Rio, Suite 201
Durango, CO 81301
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT. GARCIA
Assistant United States Attorney
s/ M. Thayne Warner
By: M. THAYNE WARNER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]