Coach, Inc. et al v. Ivory Market, Inc.
Filing
36
ORDER re: 34 Joint MOTION for Judgment Entry of Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction. A Permanent Injunction is entered against Defendant Ivory Market, Inc., d/b/a Dollar Plus (Defendant) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65; It is FURTHER O RDERED that Judgment be entered against Defendant Ivory Market, Inc. d/b/a Dollar Plus, and in favor of the Plaintiffs noted more specifically below: Statutory damages against Defendant Ivory Market, Inc. d/b/a/ Dollar Plus To Plaintiffs Coach, Inc . and Coach Services, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(1) and (2): $100,000 per counterfeit mark per type of good. Total statutory damages entered against Defendant: $500,000 Total Judgment awarded against Defendant: $500,0 00 It is FURTHER ORDERED that this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction shall operate as a final judgment as to the Defendant listed above. Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs. The Clerk shall terminate this case, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/12/2014. (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 13-cv-0115-WJM-CBS
COACH, INC., and
COACH SERVICES, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
IVORY MARKET, INC., d/b/a DOLLAR PLUS d/b/a DOLLAR PLUS,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT
AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of
Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction, filed February 10, 2014 (ECF No. 34).
The Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as
follows:
The Parties’ Joint Motion is GRANTED.
A Permanent Injunction is entered against Defendant Ivory Market, Inc., d/b/a
Dollar Plus (“Defendant”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, forever enjoining this
Defendant, through its officers, agents, servants, and employees and upon those
persons in active concert or participation with them:
1.
From manufacturing, procuring, distribution, shipping, retailing, selling,
advertising or trafficking, in any merchandise, including apparel,
sunglasses, bags, jewelry and/or related merchandise, not authorized by
the Plaintiffs, bearing unauthorized simulations, reproductions,
counterfeits, copies or colorable imitations of the Plaintiffs’ Trademarks, or
bearing a design or image which is of a substantially similar appearance to
the Plaintiffs’ Trademarks listed in the Complaint (ECF No.1);
2.
From passing off, inducing or enabling others to sell or pass off, as
authentic products produced by the Plaintiffs or otherwise authorized by
the Plaintiffs, any product not manufactured by the Plaintiffs or produced
under the control or supervision of the Plaintiffs and approved by the
Plaintiffs, which utilize any of the Plaintiffs’ Trademarks listed in the
Complaint;
3.
From further diluting and infringing Plaintiffs’ Trademarks and damaging
their goodwill;
4.
From engaging in any other activity constituting unfair competition with
Plaintiffs or that will cause the distinctiveness of Plaintiffs’ Trademarks to
be diluted; and
5.
From causing, aiding, and/or abetting any other person from doing any act
proscribed under a through d above.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment be entered against Defendant Ivory
Market, Inc. d/b/a Dollar Plus, and in favor of the Plaintiffs noted more specifically
below:
Statutory damages against Defendant Ivory Market, Inc. d/b/a/ Dollar Plus
To Plaintiffs Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(1)
and (2): $100,000 per counterfeit mark per type of good.
2
Total statutory damages entered against Defendant: $500,000
Total Judgment awarded against Defendant: $500,000
It is FURTHER ORDERED that this Consent Judgment and Permanent
Injunction shall operate as a final judgment as to the Defendant listed above.
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. The Clerk shall terminate
this case.
Dated this 12th day of February, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
__________________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?