Abdullah v. Samuels et al
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/22/2013. (skl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-000133-BNB
(The above civil action number must appear on all future papers
sent to the court in this action. Failure to include this number
may result in a delay in the consideration of your claims.)
IMAM MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHARLES SAMUELS, BOP DIRECTOR,
WARDEN BERKEBILE,
A.W. MUNSTER,
U.M. SPNRL,
U.M. HARGOOD,
C.O. SAWLER,
MANSPEAKER,
C.O. SANDS,
C.O. GONZELES,
P.A. OSAGIE,
GERAIWA, Kitchen Administrator,
U.M. RENGAL,
C.O. MONDAY,
C.M. HAWITT,
COUNSELOR FORRESTOR,
C.O. NORTON,
COUNSELOR MADISON,
C.O. MENDENA,
C.O. OTEGA,
C.O. HART,
LT. SHORTIS,
C.O. WILLIAM,
LT. WHITE HOUSE,
C.O. MILES,
C.O. COLLINS,
C.O. TORTEGILS,
C.O. STEVENS,
C.O. BILBREY,
C.O. MASSEY,
C.O. TURNER,
C.M. SUDLOW,
RELIGIOUS DEPT.,
CASSEL,
MAHUMUUD,
LEE,
FOOD DISTRIBUTION,
ARRICON,
LIEGURE,
LAW LIBRARY,
GONZELAS, Laundry, and
CHRISTIAN, Laundry,
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES
Plaintiff, Imam-Muhammad Abdullah, is in the custody of the United States
Bureau of Prisons and currently is incarcerated at ADX in Florence, Colorado. He has
submitted a pleading titled, “Temporary Restraining Order.”
As part of the Court’s review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2, the Court has
determined that the submitted document is deficient as described in this Order. Plaintiff
is required to use a Court-approved form for his claims and either pay the $350.00 filing
fee or in the alternative submit a Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit to Proceed Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff will be directed to cure the following if he wishes to pursue
his claims. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this Order must include the civil
action number noted above in the caption of this Order.
28 U.S.C. § 1915 Motion and Affidavit:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
X
X
X
is not submitted
is missing affidavit
is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6-month
period immediately preceding this filing
is missing certificate showing current balance in prison account
is missing authorization to calculate and disburse filing fee payments__
is missing required financial information
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form for filing prisoner
complaints)
names in caption do not match names in caption of complaint, petition or
2
habeas application
other:
(10)
Complaint, Petition or Application:
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
X
is not submitted
is not on proper form (must use the Court’s current form)
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
is missing page nos.
uses et al. instead of listing all parties in caption
names in caption do not match names in text
addresses must be provided for all defendants/respondents in "Section A.
Parties" of complaint, petition or habeas application
other:
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty
days from the date of this Order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this
Order must include the civil action number on this Order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff desires to proceed with this action he shall
obtain the Court-approved form used in filing a prisoner complaint and a prisoner’s 28
U.S.C. § 1915 motion and affidavit (10/1/12 Revised Date), (with the assistance of his
case manager or the facility’s legal assistant), along with the applicable instructions, at
www.cod.uscourts.gov. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies
within thirty days from the date of this Order the action will be dismissed without
further notice.
DATED: January 22, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?