Bingham et al v. FIML Natural Resources, LLC et al

Filing 41

MINUTE ORDER granting 37 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, and denying as moot in part and granting in part 39 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint, Or In the Alternative, Third Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/14/13.(dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 13–cv–00167–CMA–KMT MARK D. BINGHAM, TONY W. CHURCH, JEFFERY C. DELANEY, ANNETTE M. MONTOYA, RICK L. PARKS, AMBER D. SHETTRON, STEWART G. SQUIRES, and CHARLES L. ZORIO, individually, Plaintiffs, v. FIML NATURAL RESOURCES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DEVONSHIRE INVESTORS (DELAWARE), LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and DEVONSHIRE INVESTORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA “Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint” (Doc. No. 37, filed August 13, 2013) is GRANTED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The Clerk shall file the Third Amended Complaint and exhibits thereto (Doc. Nos. 37-1 through 37-5). Defendants’ “Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint, Or In the Alternative, Third Amended Complaint” (Doc. No. 39, filed August 13, 2013) is DENIED as moot in part and GRANTED in part. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint no later than August 28, 2013. Dated: August 14, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?