Bingham et al v. FIML Natural Resources, LLC et al
MINUTE ORDER granting 37 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, and denying as moot in part and granting in part 39 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Second Amended Complaint, Or In the Alternative, Third Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/14/13.(dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 13–cv–00167–CMA–KMT
MARK D. BINGHAM,
TONY W. CHURCH,
JEFFERY C. DELANEY,
ANNETTE M. MONTOYA,
RICK L. PARKS,
AMBER D. SHETTRON,
STEWART G. SQUIRES, and
CHARLES L. ZORIO, individually,
FIML NATURAL RESOURCES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
DEVONSHIRE INVESTORS (DELAWARE), LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and
DEVONSHIRE INVESTORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
“Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint” (Doc. No. 37, filed August 13,
2013) is GRANTED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The Clerk shall file the Third
Amended Complaint and exhibits thereto (Doc. Nos. 37-1 through 37-5).
Defendants’ “Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Second Amended
Complaint, Or In the Alternative, Third Amended Complaint” (Doc. No. 39, filed August 13,
2013) is DENIED as moot in part and GRANTED in part. Defendants shall answer or otherwise
respond to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint no later than August 28, 2013.
Dated: August 14, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?