Valles v. Gen-X Clothing No 63 et al
Filing
29
MINUTE ORDER: 12 Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 07/09/13. (alvsl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00201-RM-KLM
HILLARY VALLES,
Plaintiff,
v.
GEN-X ECHO B, INC, d/b/a GENX and
MARTIN COLLAZO RANGEL,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant GEN-X ECHO B, Inc. d/b/a GENX’s
(“GENX”) Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) [Docket No. 12; Filed April
29, 2013] (the “Motion”). On May 14, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Response [#16]. On May 31,
2013, GENX filed a Reply [#20].
On June 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed her Unopposed Motion to File Second Amended
Complaint and Join Additional Parties [#24] which was granted on July 2, 2013 [#26]. On
that date, the Second Amended Complaint [#27] was accepted by the Court and became
the operative pleading. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#12] is DENIED as moot. See, e.g.,
Strich v. United States, No. 09-cv-01913-REB-KLM, 2010 WL 14826, at *1 (D. Colo. Jan.
11, 2010) (citations omitted) (“The filing of an amended complaint moots a motion to
dismiss directed at the complaint that is supplanted and superseded.”); Gotfredson v.
Larsen LP, 432 F.Supp.2d 1163, 1172 (D. Colo. 2006) (noting that defendants’ motions to
dismiss are “technically moot because they are directed at a pleading that is no longer
operative”); AJB Props., Ltd. v. Zarda Bar-B-Q of Lenexa, LLC, No. 09-2021-JWL, 2009 WL
1140185, at *1 (D. Kan. April 28, 2009) (finding that amended complaint superseded
original complaint and “accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss the original complaint
is denied as moot”).
Dated: July 9, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?