Rickert v. Farnsworth, et al
Filing
79
ORDER denying 73 Motion to Proceed Without Discovery. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/29/13.(bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00252-CMA-BNB
JASON LEE RICKERT,
Plaintiff,
v.
REVADA FARNSWORTH, R.N., Boulder County Jail Badge #1524,
CHERI HARVEY, R.N., Boulder county Jail Badge #1581,
PATTI BOOTH, R.N., Boulder County Jail Badge #1507, and
DR. JEREMIAH KAPLAN, M.D., of the Boulder County Jail Medical,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Without Discovery [Doc. #73,
filed 10/17/2013] (the “Motion”). The Motion is DENIED.
The plaintiff discusses several unsuccessful attempts to obtain his medical records. He
attaches to the Motion his responses to the Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories. He requests
that the court “grant said motion to proceed without discovery.” In an attempt to understand the
nature of the relief sought by the plaintiff, I ordered the defendants to file a response to the
Motion. It is “not clear to Defendants what relief Plaintiff is seeking.” Defendants’ Response to
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Without Discovery [Doc. #78], ¶ 4.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that a request for a court order must “state
with particularity the grounds for seeking the order” and must “state the relief sought.” Fed. R.
Civ. P. 7(b)(1)(B) and (C). The Motion is incomprehensible and fails to specify any grounds for
relief or the precise nature of the relief sought. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Motion [Doc. #73] is DENIED;
(2) All future requests for an order shall comply with Rule 7; and
(6) Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions, including dismissal of this
case.
Dated October 29, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?