Gerard, Jr. et al v. New Elk Coal Company, LLC et al
Filing
57
COURTROOM MINUTES for Motion Hearing held on 7/25/2013 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. ORDERED: Interested Party TK Mining Services LLCs Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena 37 is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant New Elk Coal Companys Motion for Protective Order and Objections to the Subpoena Served on Non-Party TK Mining Services, LLC 38 is DENIED AS MOOT. FTR: S. Grimm. (sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No:
Courtroom Deputy:
13–cv–00277–RM–KMT
Sabrina Grimm
JAMES GERARD, JR., and
MICHAEL COX, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated,
Date: July 25, 2013
FTR: Courtroom C-201
David Tufts
Plaintiffs,
v.
NEW ELK COAL COMPANY, LLC, and
Heather Joyce
M. Robin Repass
STRATEGIC STAFFING SOLUTIONS,
Austin Smith
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES
Motion Hearing
1:35 a.m.
Court in session.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Also present and seated at defendants table, Keith Tooley and Danielle Wiletsky on behalf of
interested party, TK Mining Services, and Anni-Michelle Jean Pierre, summer associate for
Jackson Kelly.
Mr. Tufts informs the Court that all parties have reached a tentative agreement regarding the TK
Mining subpoena.
Ms. Repass reads the agreement email for the record.
Mr. Tufts reads the modifications to the agreement email for the record.
ORDERED: Interested Party TK Mining Services LLC’s Motion to Quash or Modify
Subpoena [37] is DENIED AS MOOT.
ORDERED: Defendant New Elk Coal Company’s Motion for Protective Order and
Objections to the Subpoena Served on Non-Party TK Mining Services, LLC
[38] is DENIED AS MOOT.
Court advises Mr. Tufts to file a motion if a telephonic appearance is required for future
hearings.
1:55 p.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded.
Total in-court time 00:20
*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?