Burgess v. Daniels

Filing 64

ORDER to Amend Order of January 2, 2014 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/27/14. (dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-00293-LTB COREY BURGESS, Applicant, v. CHARLES A. DANIELS, Respondent. ORDER TO AMEND ORDER OF JANUARY 2, 2014 (ECF NO. 54) On May 2, 2013, this habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 was dismissed without prejudice. See ECF No. 30. On August 19, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Tenth Circuit) affirmed. See ECF No. 61. On December 23, 2013, Applicant filed a motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (ECF No. 52) seeking reconsideration of the dismissal. On January 2, 2014, this Court entered an order (ECF No. 54) denying the Rule 60(b) motion. On August 19, 2014, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the January 2 denial of the Rule 60(b) motion and remanded to this Court to amend the January 2 order to clarify that the Rule 60(b) motion was denied with prejudice. See ECF No. 62. The Tenth Circuit mandate was filed on October 14, 2014 (ECF No. 63). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that pursuant to the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on October 14, 2014, this Court’s order of January 2, 2014, denying the motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that Applicant filed on December 23, 2013, is amended to clarify that the Rule 60(b) motion was denied with prejudice. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 27th day of October , 2014. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?