Jenkins v. Duffy Crane and Hauling, Inc. et al
MINUTE ORDER denying 39 Joint Motion to Modify Initial Disclosure Deadline by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/29/14.(dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00327-CMA-KLM
FRANKLYN A. JENKINS,
DUFFY CRANE AND HAULING, INC., a Colorado Corporation,
DUFFY HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, and
DUFFY CRANE, INC., a Colorado Corporation,
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Modify Initial
Disclosure Deadline [#39]1 (the “Motion”). In the Motion, the parties request that the
deadline for the parties to exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
set in the Court’s Order Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference [#8] be extended “until
30 days after the court rules upon the pending Motion to Reconsider.” Motion [#39] at 1.
The parties have filed four motions [##24, 28, 31, 34] requesting that the Scheduling
Conference, originally set on May 21, 2013, be rescheduled. In its last Minute Order
resetting the Scheduling Conference, the Court made clear that “[n]o further extensions will
be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.” Minute Order [#36] at 1. The parties do
not argue that extraordinary circumstances exist here and the Court does not find that
Defendants’ disagreement with Section III of the Court’s Order [#37] denying their
Amended Motion to Dismiss [#20] constitutes extraordinary circumstances. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#39] is DENIED.
Dated: January 29, 2014
“[#39]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?