Holub v. Gdowski et al

Filing 33

ORDER Granting 30 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint re [30-1]: and the second amended complaint is filed as of this date, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/9/2013.(rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 13-cv-00363-RPM GINA HOLUB, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS GDOWSKI, SHELLEY BECKER, MARK HINSON, and ADAMS 12 FIVE STAR SCHOOLS, Defendants. ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ____________________________________________________________________________ On September 16, 2013, the plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint to add Norm Jennings as a defendant on a claim of defamation based on statements made publicly on a radio talk show. The defendants filed a response to the motion on October 4, 2013, asserting that the allegations are insufficient to support a claim for willful and wanton conduct to be an exception to the immunity provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act. C.R.S. § 24-10-101, et seq. Willful and wanton conduct as Colorado law provides, includes recklessness without regard to the rights of others and that has been sufficiently pleaded and is supported by the testimony of Mr. Jennings in his deposition. The defendants’ response to the motion to amend asserts futility based on the contention that the allegations would not survive a motion to dismiss. This Court disagrees. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion to file second amended complaint is granted and the second amended complaint is filed as of this date. Dated: October 9th, 2013 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?