Holub v. Gdowski et al

Filing 85

Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 9/10/2014 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendants Hinson and Jennings are dismissed pursuant to plaintiff's request doc. 57 Plaintiff's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 55 and Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Immunity Determinations 63 , stand submitted and are taken under advisement. FTR: K. Terasaki. (jsmit)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: September 10, 2014 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ____________________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 13-cv-00363-RPM GINA HOLUB, Robert M. Liechty Plaintiff, v. CHRIS GDOWSKI, SHELLY BECKER, MARK HINSON, NORM JENNINGS, and ADAMS 12 FIVE STAR SCHOOLS, Gillian Dale Defendants. ____________________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________________ Hearing on Pending Motions 10:25 a.m. Court in session. Plaintiff Gina Holub is present. Court’s preliminary remarks. Court confirms with Mr. Liechty regarding defendants’s request for dismissal of defendants Hinson and Jennings [57]. ORDERED: Defendants’ Hinson and Jennings are dismissed pursuant to plaintiff’s request doc. [57] Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Summary Judgment. Court states its summary of the case facts and clarification of claims. Argument by Ms. Dale. Argument by Mr. Liechty. Argument by Ms. Dale. Argument by Mr. Liechty. September 10, 2014 13-cv-00363-RPM Argument by Ms. Dale. ORDERED: Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [55] and Defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Immunity Determinations [63], stand submitted and are taken under advisement. 11:10 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 45 min. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?