Holub v. Gdowski et al
Filing
85
Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 9/10/2014 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendants Hinson and Jennings are dismissed pursuant to plaintiff's request doc. 57 Plaintiff's Response to Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 55 and Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Immunity Determinations 63 , stand submitted and are taken under advisement. FTR: K. Terasaki. (jsmit)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
September 10, 2014
Courtroom Deputy:
J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician:
Kathy Terasaki
____________________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00363-RPM
GINA HOLUB,
Robert M. Liechty
Plaintiff,
v.
CHRIS GDOWSKI,
SHELLY BECKER,
MARK HINSON,
NORM JENNINGS, and
ADAMS 12 FIVE STAR SCHOOLS,
Gillian Dale
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
____________________________________________________________________________________
Hearing on Pending Motions
10:25 a.m.
Court in session.
Plaintiff Gina Holub is present.
Court’s preliminary remarks.
Court confirms with Mr. Liechty regarding defendants’s request for dismissal of defendants Hinson and
Jennings [57].
ORDERED:
Defendants’ Hinson and Jennings are dismissed pursuant to plaintiff’s request doc.
[57] Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Summary Judgment.
Court states its summary of the case facts and clarification of claims.
Argument by Ms. Dale.
Argument by Mr. Liechty.
Argument by Ms. Dale.
Argument by Mr. Liechty.
September 10, 2014
13-cv-00363-RPM
Argument by Ms. Dale.
ORDERED:
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [55] and Defendants’ Motion to Stay
Pending Immunity Determinations [63], stand submitted and are taken under
advisement.
11:10 a.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded. Total time: 45 min.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?