Rullet et al v. Target Corporation
Filing
20
ORDER Setting Second Scheduling Conference for 7/9/2013 at 03:00 PM in Conference Room, lead counsel present in person, no parties permitted, initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days before the scheduling conference, and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on July 3, 2013, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/24/2013. (rpmcd )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00411-RPM
NICOLE RULLET and
CHRIS RULLET,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION and
PACIFIC CYCLE INC.,
Defendants.
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER SETTING SECOND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
____________________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is
ORDERED that a second scheduling conference will be held on July 9, 2013, at 3:00 p.m.
in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout
Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation of
Scheduling Order which may be found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx
(Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions
(Rev. 11/11). The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers
by 4:00 p.m. on July 3, 2013. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person.
No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend.
Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days
before the scheduling conference.
Dated: May 24th, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?