Snelgrove et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al

Filing 64

ORDER Granting Unopposed 63 Motion for Extension re 31 and 55 : Wells Fargo shall file its answer to the operative complaint, as it may be further modified by the Plaintiffs, by July 21, 2014; AND that Wells Fargo shall file its response to Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, if that motion is not withdrawn by the Plaintiffs, by July 28, 2014, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 7/8/2014. (jsmit) Modified (text) on 7/8/2014 (jsmit).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-00465-RPM CHRISTOPHER S. SNELGROVE, NICOLE L. SNELGROVE, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Defendants. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION BY DEFENDANTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER AND TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Upon review of the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer and to Respond to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants, and the file in this matter, it is: ORDERED that the Motion is granted, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Wells Fargo shall file its answer to the operative complaint, as it may be further modified by the Plaintiffs, by July 21, 2014; AND that Wells Fargo shall file its response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, if that motion is not withdrawn by the Plaintiffs, by July 28, 2014. DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of July, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?