Phoenix Insurance Company, The et al v. Cantex, Inc. et al
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for Motion Hearing held on 6/8/2015 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss 194 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Continental Casualty Company's Motion to Dismiss "Bad Faith" Claim and Answer 189 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Parties shall file a brief, on or before June 12, 2015, regarding choice of law related to Kipling. FTR: Courtroom C-205. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG
Date: June 8, 2015
FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-205
THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY,
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
CONCRETE MANAGEMENT CORP,
LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,
Gregory Alan Davis
Ethan H. Siebert
CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY,
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Michael Anthony Parsons, II
Katherine Karamalegos Kust
Jeffrey A. Garcia
Francis Maurice Cavanaugh
Third Party Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
Court in Session: 1:55 p.m.
Appearance of counsel. No one appears for Plaintiffs, Concrete Management Corp., and
Landmark American Insurance Company.
Discussion and argument held on Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss
 filed November 21, 2014.
ORDERED: Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss  is
TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.
Discussion and argument held on Continental Casualty Company’s Motion to Dismiss “Bad
Faith” Claim and Answer  filed November 14, 2014.
ORDERED: Continental Casualty Company’s Motion to Dismiss “Bad Faith” Claim and
Answer  is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Parties shall file a brief, on
or before June 12, 2015, regarding choice of law related to Kipling.
Court in Recess: 2:45 p.m.
Total time in Court: 00:50
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?