Marshall v. Exelis Systems Corporation et al
MINUTE ORDER granting 23 Partially Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Jury Demand by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/7/13.(dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 13–cv–00545–CMA–KMT
EXELIS SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
EXELIS, INC., and
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
“Plaintiff’s Partially Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Jury Demand”
(Doc. No. 23, filed May 31, 2013) is GRANTED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). To the
extent Defendant Exelis, Inc., seeks to impose a condition that the plaintiff’s amendment require
Defendant Exelis, Inc., to be dismissed with prejudice, that matter is not properly before the
court. Moreover, the defendant has failed to argue or show that the plaintiff should not be
allowed to amend under Fed. R. Civ. P 15(a), which allows the court to freely allow amendment
of the pleadings “when justice so requires,” or that the amendment should not be allowed due to
“undue delay, undue prejudice to the opposing party, bad faith or dilatory motive, failure to cure
deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, or futility of amendment.” Frank v. U.S. West,
Inc., 3 F.3d 1357, 1365 (10th Cir. 1993). The Clerk is directed to file the “Amended Complaint
and Jury Demand” (Doc. No. 23-1).
Dated: June 7, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?