German v. Colvin
Filing
25
AMENDED 9 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (ORDER). SS Defendants Brief due by 12/2/2013. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 12/17/2013. By Judge John L. Kane on 11/4/13. (mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00551-AP
Rachel German,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.
AMENDED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Christa A. McGill
McGill & Noble, LLP
3518 Westgate Drive, Suite 425
Durham, NC 27707
919-493-8876
919-419-7149 (facsimile)
cmcgill@mcgillandnoble.net
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov
Noah M. Schabacker
Special Assistant United States Attorney
David I. Blower
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Denver, Colorado 80202
303-844-1571
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
David.blower@ssa.gov
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. § 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 3/4/13
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: 3/2/13
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 5/10/13
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties state that there are no other matters.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Was Filed: 8/8/13
B.
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: 12/2/13
C.
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 12/17/13
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A.
( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
B.
( X ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST
COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE
MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS
OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 4th day of November, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
s/ Christa McGill
3518 Westgate Drive, Suite 425
Durham, NC 27707
919-493-8876
919-419-7149 (facsimile)
cmcgill@mcgillandnoble.net
By: s/ David I. Blower
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, CO 80202
303-844-1571
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
David.blower@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?