USA v. $62,232.97 Seized from Vectra Bank Account # 4038009447 et al
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 Motion for Forfeiture of Property. Final order of forfeiture only as to certain defendant properties. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/30/2014.(trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00567-REB-KLM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
1. $62,232.97 SEIZED FROM VECTRA BANK ACCOUNT #4038009447,
2. $6,528.63 SEIZED FROM VECTRA BANK ACCOUNT #4037230762,
3. $702.37 SEIZED FROM US BANK ACCOUNT #151702524431,
4. $24,242.52 SEIZED FROM COMPASS BANK ACCOUNT #6700787573,
5. $1,004,786.66 SEIZED FROM COMPASS BANK ACCOUNT #6701454918,
6. $831,786.86 SEIZED FROM COMPASS BANK ACCOUNT #6700583218,
7. $19,275.96 SEIZED FROM COMPASS BANK ACCOUNT #6700666156,
8. $15,249.67 SEIZED FROM COMPASS BANK ACCOUNT #6701437681,
9. $2,198.39 SEIZED FROM ELEVATIONS CREDIT UNION ACCOUNT #259658,
10. $600.00 SEIZED FROM COMPASS BANK ACCOUNT #6700789509,
11. $100.00 SEIZED FROM COMPASS BANK ACCOUNT #6702116989,
12. $490.15 SEIZED FROM COMPASS BANK ACCOUNT #6702084189,
13. $340.76 SEIZED FROM WELLS FARGO BANK ACCOUNT #8992266356,
14. $2,796.60 SEIZED FROM WELLS FARGO BANK ACCOUNT #6249808806,
15. $695.12 SEIZED FROM NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA ACCOUNT #50051578,
16. 2011 TOYOTA TACOMA, VIN 3TMLU4EN6BM078859,
17. 2013 TRIUMPH THUNDERBIRD ABS, VIN SMTB01TL3CJ521380,
18. 710 TENACITY DRIVE, UNIT 101, LONGMONT, COLORADO, and
19. 66.51 COUNTY ROAD 1917, LINDEN, TEXAS,
Defendants.
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
ONLY AS TO CERTAIN DEFENDANT PROPERTIES
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the government’s Motion For Final Order of
Forfeiture Only as to Certain Defendant Properties [#30]1 filed September 30, 2014.
After reviewing the motion and the record, I enter the following findings:
THAT the United States commenced this action in rem pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § §
981(a)(1)(C) and 981(a)(1)(A);
THAT all know parties have been provided with an opportunity to respond and
that publication has been effected as required by Supplemental Rule G(4);
THAT the United States and David Charles Sorrells, Pamela Sorrells, and
Frontier Group, Inc. have reached an agreement in this case as to certain defendant
properties, and have filed a Consent Agreement with the court resolving all issues in
dispute;
THAT no other claims to defendant property have been filed;
1
“[#30]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
2
THAT it further appears there is cause to issue a forfeiture order only as to
certain defendant properties under 18 U.S.C. § § (a)(1)(C) and 981(a)(1)(A) in favor of
the United States.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, DECREED AND ADJUDGED:
1. That the government’s Motion For Final Order of Forfeiture Only as to
Certain Defendant Properties [#30] filed September 30, 2014, is GRANTED;
2. That forfeiture of
a.
$702.37 seized from US Bank Account #151702524431;
b.
$340.76 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #8992266356;
c.
$2,796.60 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #6249808806;
d.
$695.12 seized from National Bank of Arizona Account #50051578;
e.
2011 Toyota Tacoma, VIN 3TMLU4EN6BMO78859; and
f.
$190,000.00 in lieu of the Real property located at 66.51 County
Road 1917, Linden, Texas,
shall enter in favor of the United States;
3.. That the United States shall have full and legal title to the certain defendant
properties listed above, and may dispose of them in accordance with law and in
accordance with the terms and provisions of the parties Consent Agreement;
4. That the clerk of court is directed to enter Judgment; and
3
5. That a Certificate of Reasonable Cause, which this Order constitutes, is
granted as to all defendant property pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465.
Dated September 30, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?