Haslett v. Security Fire Protection District
Filing
53
ORDER granting 49 Unopposed Motion to Approve Settlement of OvertimeClaim of Donald Chittenden. The parties shall file a motion or stipulation to dismiss with prejudice on or before 12/20/2013. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/16/2013. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00568-BNB-KMT
ZACHARY HASLETT
on behalf of himself and others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
SECURITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, a special district, and
ROBERT “SKI” STAMBAUGH, individually,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the Unopposed Motion to Approve Settlement of Overtime
Claim of Donald Chittenden [Doc. # 49, filed 11/26/2013] (the “Motion”). I held a hearing on
the Motion this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.
I find that the settlement of the claims of Donald Chittenden, the only opt-in plaintiff in
this collective action, in the amount of $19,500 is fair and reasonable under the circumstances of
this case. I find also that a 20% attorneys fee award to the firm of Cornish & Dell’Olio, P.C., is
fair and reasonable in view of the work undertaken on by that firm on the behalf of Mr.
Chittenden.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
The Motion [Doc. # 49] is GRANTED;
(2)
The settlement of the claims of Mr. Chittenden in the amount of $19,500.00 is fair
and reasonable and is approved;
(3)
An award of attorneys fees to the firm of Cornish & Dell’Olio, P.C., in the
amount of $3,900.00 for the work performed on behalf of Mr. Chittenden also is fair and
reasonable and is approved; and
(4)
The parties shall file a motion or stipulation to dismiss with prejudice on or before
December 20, 2013.
Dated December 16, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?