Ortiz v. Falk et al

Filing 86

MINUTE ORDER denying 84 plaintiff's "Amended Motion", by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/13/2014.(mjwcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00612-PAB-MJW
ALEXIS R. ORTIZ,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
JAMES FALK, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility,
BEVERLY DOWIS, Health Services Administrator, Sterling Correctional Facility,
JO ANN STOCK, Physicians Assistant, Sterling Correctional Facility,
LT. HOFFMAN, Housing Lieutenant, Sterling Correctional Facility,
in their individual and official capacities,
Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s “Amended Motion” (Docket No. 84) is
denied. The court cannot discern what relief plaintiff is seeking in this motion. To the
extent plaintiff is once again objecting to the Scheduling Order, such objections are
overruled. As this court previously stated in a Minute Order entered on December 18,
2013 (Docket No. 82), defendants’ Scheduling Order, to which plaintiff apparently
objects, was merely a proposed Scheduling Order. The Scheduling Conference that
had been set for December 9, 2013, was vacated (see Docket No. 72), and thus a
Scheduling Order was never entered by this court.
Dated: January 13, 2014