Tennyson v. Carpenter et al
Filing
39
ORDER Reinstating Case. This civil action is reinstated pursuant to the Order and Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on March 18, 2014 (ECF No. 35 ), and the Tenth Circuit mandate filed on April 16, 2014 (ECF No. 37 ). The case shall be reassigned to the pro se docket. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/7/2014. (klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00648-LTB
AUDREY LEE TENNYSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
MATTHEW CARPENTER, Chief of Unit Managers,
ROBERT SPARKS, Unit Manager,
“THE SUPERIORS,” Not Yet Identified,
VANCE EVERETT, K.C.C.C. Warden,
KIT CARSON CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Private Prison, and
ROGER WERHOLTZ, C.D.O.C. Executive Director,
Defendants.
ORDER REINSTATING CASE
Pursuant to the Order and Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for
the Tenth Circuit filed on March 18, 2014 (ECF No. 35), and the Tenth Circuit mandate
filed on April 16, 2014 (ECF No. 37), this civil action will be reinstated.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that this civil action is reinstated pursuant to the Order and Judgment
of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on March 18, 2014 (ECF
No. 35), and the Tenth Circuit mandate filed on April 16, 2014 (ECF No. 37). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the case shall be reassigned to the pro se docket.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this
7th
day of
May
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court
2
, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?