Tennyson v. Carpenter et al

Filing 39

ORDER Reinstating Case. This civil action is reinstated pursuant to the Order and Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on March 18, 2014 (ECF No. 35 ), and the Tenth Circuit mandate filed on April 16, 2014 (ECF No. 37 ). The case shall be reassigned to the pro se docket. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/7/2014. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-00648-LTB AUDREY LEE TENNYSON, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CARPENTER, Chief of Unit Managers, ROBERT SPARKS, Unit Manager, “THE SUPERIORS,” Not Yet Identified, VANCE EVERETT, K.C.C.C. Warden, KIT CARSON CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Private Prison, and ROGER WERHOLTZ, C.D.O.C. Executive Director, Defendants. ORDER REINSTATING CASE Pursuant to the Order and Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on March 18, 2014 (ECF No. 35), and the Tenth Circuit mandate filed on April 16, 2014 (ECF No. 37), this civil action will be reinstated. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this civil action is reinstated pursuant to the Order and Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit filed on March 18, 2014 (ECF No. 35), and the Tenth Circuit mandate filed on April 16, 2014 (ECF No. 37). It is FURTHER ORDERED that the case shall be reassigned to the pro se docket. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 7th day of May BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge United States District Court 2 , 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?