Harden et al v. Krabloonik, Inc.

Filing 54

ORDER Granting #43 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike the Testimony of Defendants Expert Michael Robinson ; Denying as moot #44 Plaintiffs' Motion for Enlargement of time, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/31/2014.(evana, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00653-RPM
HARRY HARDEN and
MELODY HARDEN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
KRABLOONIK, INCORPORATED,
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL
ROBINSON
____________________________________________________________________________
Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike the Testimony of Defendant’s Expert
Michael Robinson [Doc. 43], the defendant’s response [Doc. 51] and the plaintiffs’ reply [Doc.
52], it is
ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion to strike is granted. The purported testimony of the
defendant’s expert is inadmissible. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion for enlargement of time [Doc. 44] is
moot.
DATED: December 31st, 2014
BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch
__________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge