Harden et al v. Krabloonik, Inc.

Filing 54

ORDER Granting 43 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike the Testimony of Defendants Expert Michael Robinson ; Denying as moot 44 Plaintiffs' Motion for Enlargement of time, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/31/2014.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 13-cv-00653-RPM HARRY HARDEN and MELODY HARDEN, Plaintiffs, v. KRABLOONIK, INCORPORATED, ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL ROBINSON ____________________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike the Testimony of Defendant’s Expert Michael Robinson [Doc. 43], the defendant’s response [Doc. 51] and the plaintiffs’ reply [Doc. 52], it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion to strike is granted. The purported testimony of the defendant’s expert is inadmissible. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion for enlargement of time [Doc. 44] is moot. DATED: December 31st, 2014 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?