Purzel Video GmbH, Inc. v. Does 1-200

Filing 25

ORDER. ORDERED that Doe No. 22 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Doe No. 53 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 08/06/13. (jjhsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00683-WYD-MEH
PURZEL VIDEO GmbH,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOES 1, 2, 4-7, 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 26, 28, 31, 34, 36, 38, 43, 45, 46, 48, 49, and 51-53,
Defendants.

ORDER

In accordance with Plaintiff’s Dismissal of Doe Nos. 22 and 53 Pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(i) (ECF No. 24), it is
ORDERED that Doe No. 22 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Doe
No. 53 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Doe Nos. 22 and 53 shall be taken off the
caption.
Dated: August 6, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
WILEY Y. DANIEL,
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE